Crafting Medical Education Differently: An Innovative Pedagogical Approach to Enhance Deep Learning in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

In this article we explore an innovative pedagogical approach initiated during the COVID-19 lockdown period to support student learning in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of Cape Town. Student isolation and the lack of exposure to clinical cases during this period brought many challenges to the teaching platform. However, the global disruption enabled an ontological opening for imaginative and creative experimentation, an aspect of teaching rarely brought into medical training. We take up the unusual work of a clinician educator and others to describe the process of developing novel video recordings for undergraduate medical students. These videos, used as pedagogical tools, enabled new ways of engaging with core curricular needs in this discipline: for the teacher, new ways of producing teaching materials, and for the students, new ways of learning medical content. The videos drew on a range of creative modes including drawing and acting, to augment student learning. As authors, we suggest that the collision of the clinical content and the performative delivery in the videos fostered deep learning and made the curricular material alive and engaging. The existence of the videos enables a sustainable blended learning approach moving forward. The uploading of the videos as Open Educational Resources onto a YouTube channel and a public website now also contribute to teaching resources extending beyond institutional boundaries. © SOTL in the South 2023.

Early infection risk in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with rituximab or belimumab from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Biologics Register (BILAG-BR): a prospective longitudinal study

Background: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at an increased risk of infection relative to the general population. We aimed to describe the frequency and risk factors for serious infections in patients with moderate-to-severe SLE treated with rituximab, belimumab, and standard of care therapies in a large national observational cohort. Method(s): The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Biologics Register (BILAG-BR) is a UK-based prospective register of patients with SLE. Patients were recruited by their treating physician as part of their scheduled care from 64 centres across the UK by use of a standardised case report form. Inclusion criteria for the BILAG-BR included age older than 5 years, ability to provide informed consent, a diagnosis of SLE, and starting a new biological therapy within the last 12 months or a new standard of care drug within the last month. The primary outcome for this study was the rate of serious infections within the first 12 months of therapy. Serious infections were defined as those requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment, hospital admission, or resulting in morbidity or death. Infection and mortality data were collected from study centres and further mortality data were collected from the UK Office for National Statistics. The relationship between serious infection and drug type was analysed using a multiple-failure Cox proportional hazards model. Finding(s): Between July 1, 2010, and Feb 23, 2021, 1383 individuals were recruited to the BILAG-BR. 335 patients were excluded from this analysis. The remaining 1048 participants contributed 1002.7 person-years of follow-up and included 746 (71%) participants on rituximab, 119 (11%) participants on belimumab, and 183 (17%) participants on standard of care. The median age of the cohort was 39 years (IQR 30-50), 942 (90%) of 1048 patients were women and 106 (10%) were men. Of the patients with available ethnicity data, 514 (56%) of 911 were White, 169 (19%) were Asian, 161 (18%) were Black, and 67 (7%) were of multiple-mixed or other ethnic backgrounds. 118 serious infections occurred in 76 individuals during the 12-month study period, which included 92 serious infections in 58 individuals on rituximab, eight serious infections in five individuals receiving belimumab, and 18 serious infections in 13 individuals on standard of care. The overall crude incidence rate of serious infection was 117.7 (95% CI 98.3-141.0) per 1000 person-years. Compared with standard of care, the serious infection risk was similar in the rituximab (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.68 [0.60-4.68]) and belimumab groups (1.01 [0.21-4.80]). Across the whole cohort in multivariate analysis, serious infection risk was associated with prednisolone dose (>10 mg;2.38 [95%CI 1.47-3.84]), hypogammaglobulinaemia (<6 g/L;2.16 [1.38-3.37]), and multimorbidity (1.45 [1.17-1.80]). Additional concomitant immunosuppressive use appeared to be associated with a reduced risk (0.60 [0.41-0.90]). We found no significant safety signals regarding atypical infections. Six infection-related deaths occurred at a median of 121 days (IQR 60-151) days from cohort entry. Interpretation(s): In patients with moderate-to-severe SLE, rituximab, belimumab, and standard immunosuppressive therapy have similar serious infection risks. Key risk factors for serious infections included multimorbidity, hypogammaglobulinaemia, and increased glucocorticoid doses. When considering the risk of serious infection, we propose that immunosupppressives, rituximab, and belimumab should be prioritised as mainstay therapies to optimise SLE management and support proactive minimisation of glucocorticoid use. Funding(s): None.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license

Rates of Hypoglycemia with Reduced- vs. Standard-Dose Insulin for Hyperkalemia Treatment in Renal Insufficiency

Objective: The primary objective was to assess the difference in rates of hypoglycemia (blood glucose (BG) <=70 mG/dL) when using reduced-dose (5 units) vs. standard-dose (10 units) of IV regular insulin for hyperkalemia treatment in renal insufficiency. Secondary objectives include the efficacy of insulin dose on potassium reduction and evaluating the difference in rates of severe hypoglycemia (BG <=54 mG/dL) between the groups. Method(s): This was a retrospective chart review of patients with renal insufficiency treated with IV regular insulin for hyperkalemia at a tertiary care teaching hospital from June 2020 to June 2021, with institutional review board approval. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients aged 18 years and older with elevated baseline potassium (>=5.5 mEq/L), estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73m2, end stage renal disease, or presence of acute kidney injury, having received either 5 or 10 units of IV regular insulin for hyperkalemia, and had documented glucose and potassium levels after insulin administration. Patients who were pregnant, had diabetic ketoacidosis, or a baseline BG <=70 mG/dL were excluded. Data collection included patient demographics, diabetes history, relevant labs at time of elevated potassium, doses of insulin and dextrose administered for hyperkalemia treatment, presence of coronavirus-19 infection, glucose levels within 6 hours and first potassium level within 24 hours following insulin administration, concurrent use of potassium-lowering agents, insulin outside of hyperkalemia treatment, or steroids, and mortality. Result(s): Out of 409 patients included, 92 were in the 10-unit group and 317 in the 5-unit group. The rate of hypoglycemia in the 5-unit arm vs. the 10-unit arm was 6.9% vs. 8.7% (p=0.649), respectively. The rate of severe hypoglycemia between the 5-unit arm and the 10-unit arm was 3.2% vs 5.4% (p=0.682), respectively. The percent normalization of potassium was not statistically different between the 5-unit group and the 10-unit group (59% vs. 68%;p=0.115), with the same mean reduction in potassium from baseline (0.8 mEq/L (p=0.947)). Administration of concurrent treatments for hyperkalemia was similar between the groups, with dialysis being the only one with statistical significance in normalization of potassium. Patient characteristics that could have an impact on risk of hypoglycemia were studied and analyzed, including pre-treatment BG, history of diabetes mellitus, insulin naive, and patient weight. In patients with hypoglycemia (n=30) vs. those without hypoglycemia (n=379), there was a significantly different mean pre-treatment BG (113 mG/dL vs. 178 mG/dL, p<0.001). Discussion/Conclusion: There was no significant difference in rates of hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia between the 5-unit vs. 10-unit groups. There was no significant change in potassium normalization between the two insulin doses. Because of the small number of hypoglycemia events, larger studies are needed to better understand if 5 units of regular insulin is a safer option for the treatment of hyperkalemia in renal insufficiency.Copyright © 2023

Distinguishing SARS-CoV-2 persistence and reinfection: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 reinfection is poorly understood, partly because few studies have systematically applied genomic analysis to distinguish reinfection from persistent RNA detection related to initial infection. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and persistent RNA detection using independent genomic, clinical, and laboratory assessments. METHODS: All individuals at a large academic medical center who underwent a SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) ≥ 45 days after an initial positive test, with both tests between March 14th and December 30th, 2020, were analyzed for potential reinfection. Inclusion criteria required having ≥2 positive NAATs collected ≥45 days apart with a cycle threshold (Ct) value <35 at repeat testing. For each included subject, likelihood of reinfection was assessed by viral genomic analysis of all available specimens with a Ct value <35, structured Ct trajectory criteria, and case-by-case review by infectious diseases physicians. RESULTS: Among 1,569 individuals with repeat SARS-CoV-2 testing ≥45 days after an initial positive NAAT, 65 (4%) met cohort inclusion criteria. Viral genomic analysis characterized mutations present, and was successful for 14/65 (22%) subjects. Six subjects had genomically-supported reinfection and eight subjects had genomically-supported persistent RNA detection. Compared to viral genomic analysis, clinical and laboratory assessments correctly distinguished reinfection from persistent RNA detection in 12/14 (86%) subjects but missed 2/6 (33%) genomically-supported reinfections. CONCLUSION: Despite good overall concordance with viral genomic analysis, clinical and Ct value-based assessments failed to identify 33% of genomically-supported reinfections. Scaling-up genomic analysis for clinical use would improve detection of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections.

Just what is afropessimism and what's it doing in a nice field like education?: Unpacking new contributions to Black educational thought

In recent years, the theory of antiblackness known, generally, as 'afropessimism' has been taken up in the field of Education. In this article, the author outlines afropessimism and emplaces it into the traditions of Black educational thought, namely Critical Race Theory. The article also highlights the emerging contributions of scholars who have begun to incorporate the use of afropessimist theory into their work. Ultimately, the author argues that the urgent and critical questions that afropessimism demands has the potential to open up a whole new world of inquiry and action in our quest for a liberatory and liberated Black education. [ FROM AUTHOR]

RISKY BUSINESS: HEALTH CARE BEFORE AND AFTER TRUMP

This chapter focuses on the Trump administration's health policies, with an emphasis on its efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act and its response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It assesses those policies both in the context of the administration's broader goals and motivations, and in the context of systemic deficits and deficiencies in American health policy. I argue that failures of health policy and health security in the face of the pandemic reflect those longstanding weaknesses, much more so than the administration's actions (or inaction). © 2023 by Emerald Publishing Limited All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

COVID-19 DISRUPTION TO PROSTATE CANCER MANAGEMENT IN A UK TERTIARY REFERRAL CENTRE

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Covid-19 caused major disruptions to cancer diagnosis and treatment. We aimed to evaluate the longitudinal disruption to prostate cancer management. METHODS: We completed a prospective service evaluation from 01/09/2019 to 31/08/2021 of all referrals, investigations, and treatments for prostate cancer at a single centre. The first UK Covid-19 lockdown occurred from 23/03/20 to 04/07/2020: monthly data for the time period before, during, and after the first UK lockdown were compared using ANOVA and Tukey HSD. RESULTS: We identified 4501 patients for inclusion. There was a profound decrease in all aspects of prostate cancer management during the first lockdown period. For pre-lockdown, lockdown, and postlockdown periods respectively, the mean monthly rates were: 256 v 125 v 363 PSA tests (p=0.0003);86 v 40 v 79 two-week-wait referrals (p=0.0005);62 v 18 v 54 MRI imaging for possible cancer (p<0.0001);32 v 15 v 36 diagnoses (p=0.002);17 v 9 v 14 prostatectomies (p=0.06). In the period after the first lockdown, despite the previous drop, we did not observe an increase in the number of referrals, MRI imaging, diagnoses, or treatment required (including active monitoring, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, prostatectomy, and palliative care) in comparison to pre-lockdown levels (all p>0.05). However, interestingly, we did see an increase in the number of PSA tests performed (p=0.04), which continued through the two subsequent UK lockdowns. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide an overview of the impact of COVID-19 national lockdowns on the whole prostate cancer management pathway - from initial referral to final treatment. Despite the disruption to prostate cancer management during the first UK Covid-19 lockdown leading to a decrease in referrals, diagnoses and treatment in the context of reduced PSA testing, we have not seen a subsequent increase in these numbers after lockdown despite a rise in PSA testing. The rise in the number PSA tests performed post-lockdown may suggest a degree of compensatory PSA observation in the community. (Figure Presented).

Whiteness in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Who is Talking About Racism With Their Kids?

The present study investigated factors associated with parent awareness and socialization surrounding COVID-19-related racial disparities among White parents of children ages 1.5–8 living in Canada and the United States (N = 423, 88% mothers). Participants responded to an online survey about parenting during the pandemic between mid to late-April 2020. Participants reported on their level of awareness of COVID-19-related racial disparities as well as how often they discussed these with their children. Although 52% reported some level of awareness, only 34% reported any amount of discussion with their child about it. Regression models were used to further examine stress-related, socioeconomic, parenting, and news-watching associations with awareness and socialization. This study provides unique insight into which White parents are aware of racial inequities exposed by the pandemic and which are choosing to speak to their children about them. Current summary recommendations for White racial socialization and related research are also presented. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Family Issues is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

How a global pandemic fuelled an all-time career high in emergency remote teaching at the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT : This short report describes innovationsthat were created for the purposesof Emergency Remote Teaching in the discipline of obstetrics & gynaecology at the University of Cape Town, when students were not allowed onto the clinical platform during the COVID-19 lockdown. T he authorset about creating a bank of novel videos, s eeking to motivate students and provide an enjoyable learning experience, as well as give them a semblance of clinical exposure.The videos covered basic foundational content, as well as a series of simulated patients that were primarily acted out by the author herself. Students responded very positively to the video content, resulting an an entire redesign of the curriculum and its delivery going forward

Transmission from vaccinated individuals in a large SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant outbreak.

An outbreak of over 1,000 COVID-19 cases in Provincetown, Massachusetts (MA), in July 2021-the first large outbreak mostly in vaccinated individuals in the US-prompted a comprehensive public health response, motivating changes to national masking recommendations and raising questions about infection and transmission among vaccinated individuals. To address these questions, we combined viral genomic and epidemiological data from 467 individuals, including 40% of outbreak-associated cases. The Delta variant accounted for 99% of cases in this dataset; it was introduced from at least 40 sources, but 83% of cases derived from a single source, likely through transmission across multiple settings over a short time rather than a single event. Genomic and epidemiological data supported multiple transmissions of Delta from and between fully vaccinated individuals. However, despite its magnitude, the outbreak had limited onward impact in MA and the US overall, likely due to high vaccination rates and a robust public health response.

Association of endotoxemia with AKI in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection

Background: AKI is frequently complicated by sepsis. Endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide), a component of the outer wall of gram-negative bacteria, has been investigated and acknowledged as one of the triggers of lethal shock during sepsis and drivers of cytokine storm. In studies, septic shock was present in 6.4% patients with severe COVID-19, but blood cultures and respiratory cultures were negative in 76%. Initial cohort study of COVID-19 patients from China showed 4.5% developed AKI, subsequent reports showed higher prevalence. While these data suggest that patients with COVID-19 are at risk for septic shock and AKI, mechanisms mediating these processes in the setting of severe coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a single-center, cross-sectional study in critically ill patients with COVID-19 to test the prevalence of endotoxemia and whether endotoxemia is associated with the development of AKI. Patients were recruited using criteria: Age ≥ 18yr, MODS ≥ 9, sepsis and intensive care unit admission, excluded if pregnant, requiring chronic dialysis or chronic immunosuppressive medications. Blood endotoxin activity (EA) measured in patients who met the criteria using the FDA-approved Endotoxin Activity Assay (EAA). EAA is a chemiluminescent bio-assay based on the oxidative burst reaction of activated neutrophils to complement coated LPS-IgM immune complexes. Patients divided into low (0.0 -0.39 EA units), intermediate (0.40 -0.59 EA units), high (≥ 0.60 EA units), and non-responder (NR) (patients whose neutrophils do not have the ability to respond to preformed immune complexes in the EAA) group based on measurements from the EAA. Results: In this study, endotoxemia observed in 24/32 (75%) of our critically ill patients with COVID-19, despite only 2 patients having positive blood cultures for gramnegative organisms. The incidence of AKI was higher in the high EA group (7/14, 50%) as compared to intermediate EA group (1/10, 10%), p=0.01. The need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) was higher in the elevated EA group (4/14, 29%), with none of the patients in the intermediate group requiring RRT, p=0.008. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the high prevalence of endotoxemia in critically ill patients with COVID-19, regardless of presence of bacteremia. We also observed that high EA was associated with AKI and the need for RRT.

Evidence of transmission from fully vaccinated individuals in a large outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in Provincetown, Massachusetts (preprint)

Multiple summer events, including large indoor gatherings, in Provincetown, Massachusetts (MA), in July 2021 contributed to an outbreak of over one thousand COVID-19 cases among residents and visitors. Most cases were fully vaccinated, many of whom were also symptomatic, prompting a comprehensive public health response, motivating changes to national masking recommendations, and raising questions about infection and transmission among vaccinated individuals. To characterize the outbreak and the viral population underlying it, we combined genomic and epidemiological data from 467 individuals, including 40% of known outbreak-associated cases. The Delta variant accounted for 99% of sequenced outbreak-associated cases. Phylogenetic analysis suggests over 40 sources of Delta in the dataset, with one responsible for a single cluster containing 83% of outbreak-associated genomes. This cluster was likely not the result of extensive spread at a single site, but rather transmission from a common source across multiple settings over a short time. Genomic and epidemiological data combined provide strong support for 25 transmission events from, including many between, fully vaccinated individuals; genomic data alone provides evidence for an additional 64. Together, genomic epidemiology provides a high-resolution picture of the Provincetown outbreak, revealing multiple cases of transmission of Delta from fully vaccinated individuals. However, despite its magnitude, the outbreak was restricted in its onward impact in MA and the US, likely due to high vaccination rates and a robust public health response.

Coronavirus stigmatization and psychological distress among Asians in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus stigmatization may be disproportionately impacting ethnoracial minority groups in the US. We test three hypotheses: [H1] Asians in the US are more likely to report experiencing coronavirus stigmatization than non-Hispanic Whites; [H2] Coronavirus stigmatization is associated with psychological distress; [H3] Magnitude of association between coronavirus stigmatization and psychological distress is more pronounced among US-born Asians, compared to non-Hispanic Whites. DESIGN: We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from the 10-31 March 2020 wave of the Understanding America Survey, a nationally representative survey of adults in the US. Psychological distress was assessed with the PHQ-4. Measures of association were estimated using multiple logistic regression and survey sampling weights. Predicted probabilities were calculated using marginal standardization ( n = 6707). RESULTS: [H1] The adjusted predicted probability of experiencing any coronavirus stigma among foreign-born Asians (11.2%, 95% CI: 5.5-17.0%; E-value = 4.52), US-born Asians (10.9%, 95% CI: 5.8-16.0%; E-value = 4.23), Blacks (8.0%, 95% CI: 5.3-10.7%; E-value = 2.92), and Hispanic Whites (7.3%, 95% CI: 4.6-9.9%; E-value = 2.58) was significantly greater than non-Hispanic Whites (4.5%, 95% CI: 3.7-5.4%). [H2] Individuals reporting any coronavirus stigma experience were significantly more likely to exhibit psychological distress (19.9%, 95% CI: 14.6-25.2% vs 10.6%, 9.6-11.6%; E-value = 3.16). [H3] The overall magnitude of association between experience of any coronavirus stigma and psychological distress was not significantly between US-born Asians and non-Hispanic Whites, though we found gender to mask this effect. US-born Asian females who experienced coronavirus stigmatization were more likely to exhibit psychological distress than non-Hispanic white females who experienced coronavirus stigmatization (relative risk (RR): 10.21, 95% CI: 2.69-38.74 vs 1.24, 95% CI: 0.76-2.01; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive measures around care seeking, public awareness, and disaggregated data collection are needed to address ethnoracial coronavirus stigmatization and its impact on psychological health and well-being.

Mental health and clinical psychological science in the time of COVID-19: Challenges, opportunities, and a call to action.

COVID-19 presents significant social, economic, and medical challenges. Because COVID-19 has already begun to precipitate huge increases in mental health problems, clinical psychological science must assert a leadership role in guiding a national response to this secondary crisis. In this article, COVID-19 is conceptualized as a unique, compounding, multidimensional stressor that will create a vast need for intervention and necessitate new paradigms for mental health service delivery and training. Urgent challenge areas across developmental periods are discussed, followed by a review of psychological symptoms that likely will increase in prevalence and require innovative solutions in both science and practice. Implications for new research directions, clinical approaches, and policy issues are discussed to highlight the opportunities for clinical psychological science to emerge as an updated, contemporary field capable of addressing the burden of mental illness and distress in the wake of COVID-19 and beyond. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).